Specialised domain

AI Product Design & Copilot Ergonomics

Bridging the gap between probabilistic AI models and deterministic human expectations.

3x
Faster analyst decision velocity
0
Black-box frustration
100%
Human-in-the-loop transparency

Context

Why it matters.

Most AI products fail because they treat an LLM as a novelty chat box slapped onto an old interface. I design AI-native interfaces that surface confidence intervals, provide inline editable suggestions, respect context windows, and give users total control over automated actions.

Bottlenecks

Friction I solve.

  • Designing for non-deterministic AI latency and conversational streaming states
  • Communicating model confidence without misleading users on edge-case hallucinations
  • Creating granular human review controls (Accept, Edit, Reject, Rollback)
  • Moving beyond generic chat interfaces into inline contextual workspace suggestions

Principles

Rules I design by.

  1. AI should propose, but the human must always dispose.
  2. Never hide what data was used to reach an AI conclusion; citation is trust.
  3. Latency states should feel purposeful: progressive token rendering and skeleton previews.

Deliverables

What you receive.

  • AI Copilot & Inline Action Ergonomics
  • Confidence Heuristic UI Frameworks
  • Human-in-the-Loop Approval Workflows
  • Generative Canvas & Contextual Cards

FAQ

Questions, answered.

Why is a chat interface often the wrong choice for enterprise AI?

Chat forces users to imagine prompt queries from scratch and review unstructured paragraphs. Contextual cards, inline diffs, and structured recommendation widgets are significantly faster for enterprise workflows.

How do you handle AI hallucinations in the UI?

By designing confidence thresholds that prompt the human when ambiguity is high, displaying explicit citations, and allowing 1-click manual inline overrides.